Asking the pikas politely…
, .In 1992. the U.S. Con· projects mentioned above. grcss under President George This bill does not ab- Bush passed the Omnibus solutely prevent ground water Water Bill of which Title XV development The Secretary of was pllft. T~en Senator Tim the Interior could, after suffi- Wirth iniJoduced and carried cient study. find that a particu- the bill, a lso known as the lar development did not have "Wirth anti-American Water adverse consequences on des- Development Bill". The bi)l ignated federal facilities and was wriuen to protect federal allow it to go forward. projects with water rights in Valley water exporta- the San Luis Valley including tion, because of its billion dol- the Closed Basin Proj!!cl, The Jar profit potential, has not de- Alamosa and Monte Vista terred other potential investors. Wildlife Refuges or the Great such as Farallon Capital Mnn- Snnd Dunes N:nionnl Monu- ngemcnt,Inc., who have a part· ment. nership with Stockman's Wa- Title XV. basically, ter Co .. even though Title XV gives the Secretary of the lnle· ha~ been passed by Congress rior the right to refuse any and signed by the President.
Knowledge graph centered on Remember Title XV: San Luis Valley Water Protectio with 10 nodes and 44 connections. Top connected: Congress, Secretary of the Interior, groundwater hydrology, Colorado State Soil Conservation Board, Water Rights.
Agencies, organizations, and groups mentioned as actors in this document.
Works cited by this document, grouped by type.
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.