Knowledge graph centered on systematic literature review (Apidae) with 53 nodes and 153 connections. Top connected: Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Two-form Bumble Bee, Bumble Bees, Yellow-fronted Bumble Bee, Buff-tailed Bumble Bee.
Method synopsis
A systematic search and review of published literature on ecological drivers and consequences of body size variation in bumble bees using standardized database queries and inclusion criteria.
Synthesized from method descriptions across 1 paper using this protocol.
Procedure from a recent peer-reviewed implementation
Searched Web of Science database using keyword combinations including 'bumble bee' OR 'bumblebee' AND 'body size' OR 'size variation' applied to titles, abstracts, and author keywords
Quantities: Initial search returned 304 papers from Web of ScienceDuration: Search conducted through December 2021Conditions: Restricted to papers published between 1955-2021
Equipment: Web of Science database
Secondary database search
Repeated search parameters in Scopus database to capture additional relevant literature not indexed in Web of Science
Quantities: Scopus search returned 225 additional papersDuration: Search conducted through December 2021Conditions: Same date restrictions as Web of Science search
Equipment: Scopus database
Literature screening and inclusion assessment
Applied inclusion criteria to assess whether papers: (1) included bumble bees in their study; (2) described a cause or consequence of size variation; and (3) were ecological in nature. Excluded papers focused on molecular physiology or genetic mechanisms of size regulation.
Quantities: Screened combined total of 350 unique papers, with 187 meeting final inclusion criteria
Conditions: Papers had to focus on ecological rather than molecular/genetic aspects
Data extraction and categorization
For each included paper, extracted information on study type (drivers vs consequences), scale (intraspecific vs interspecific), geographic location, focal species, and specific ecological factors examined
Quantities: Categorized all 187 papers across multiple dimensions of analysisDuration: Not specifiedConditions: Systematic extraction of comparable data fields from each paper