Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species

Abstract

Variation in the interactions between a nectar-robbing bumblebee and its host plants may have important consequences with respect to the population dynamics of host plants as well as selection on floral and flowering traits.

Local Knowledge Graph (Top 58 entities)

View in full graph →

Loading graph...

Related Works

Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.

Article

Nectar Robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: Effects on Pollinator Behavior and Plant Fitness

1998Oecologia33 shared entitiescited

Article

Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant

2000Ecology32 shared entitiescited

Article

Nectar-robbing bumble bees reduce the fitness of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae)

1999Ecologycited

Dataset

Data from: Quantifying direct vs. indirect effects of nectar robbers on male and female components of plant fitness

201675% similar

Dataset

Data from: Foraging efficiency and size matching in a plant – pollinator community: the importance of sugar content and tongue length

202075% similar

Dataset

Revegetation with Native Plant Species: proceedings, 1997 Society for Ecological Restoration Annual Meeting

55% similar

Cited By (123 times, 21 in Knowledge Commons)

Article

The hole truth: why do bumble bees rob flowers more than once?

2024DOI: 10.3390/plants13172507

Article

Nectar addition changes pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction in pollen rewarding Lupinus argenteus

2021DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1613

Article

The sensory and cognitive ecology of nectar robbing

2021DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.698137

Thesis

Floral reward strategies, visitor behavior, and plant reproductive outcomes

2019

Article

Why are some plant-nectar robber interactions commensalisms?

2018DOI: 10.1111/oik.05440

Article

Costs and benefits of alternative food handling tactics help explain facultative exploitation of pollination mutualisms

2018DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2395

Thesis

Conditional Exploitation and Context-Dependent Fitness Consequences of Pollination Mutualisms

2018

Article

Facilitated exploitation of pollination mutualisms: fitness consequences for plants

2017

Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species

Abstract

Local Knowledge Graph (Top 58 entities)

Related Works

Nectar Robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: Effects on Pollinator Behavior and Plant Fitness

Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant

Nectar-robbing bumble bees reduce the fitness of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae)

Data from: Quantifying direct vs. indirect effects of nectar robbers on male and female components of plant fitness

Data from: Foraging efficiency and size matching in a plant – pollinator community: the importance of sugar content and tongue length

Why are some plant—nectar robber interactions commensalisms?

Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics And Biodiversity: Proceedings

A New Hydrologic Perspective of How Beaver Ponds Function

Revegetation with Native Plant Species: proceedings, 1997 Society for Ecological Restoration Annual Meeting

Cited By (123 times, 21 in Knowledge Commons)

The hole truth: why do bumble bees rob flowers more than once?

Nectar addition changes pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction in pollen rewarding Lupinus argenteus

The sensory and cognitive ecology of nectar robbing

Floral reward strategies, visitor behavior, and plant reproductive outcomes

Why are some plant-nectar robber interactions commensalisms?

Costs and benefits of alternative food handling tactics help explain facultative exploitation of pollination mutualisms

Conditional Exploitation and Context-Dependent Fitness Consequences of Pollination Mutualisms

Facilitated exploitation of pollination mutualisms: fitness consequences for plants

Quantifying direct vs. indirect effects of nectar robbers on male and female components of plant fitness

The Impact of Primary and Secondary Robbing on Hummingbird Pollination.

Norditerpene alkaloid concentrations in tissues and floral rewards of larkspurs and impacts on pollinators

Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in Ipomopsis aggregata

Interactions between nectar robbers and seed predators mediated by a shared host plant, Ipomopsis aggregata

Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: implications of pollen limitation and plant mating system

The consequences of direct versus indirect spsecies interactions on selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata

Nectar robbing patterns in Ipomopsis aggregata and Linaria vulgaris

Interactions among nectar robbing, floral herbivory, and ant protection in Linaria vulgaris

Effects of nectar robbing on nectar dynamics and bumblebee foraging strategies in Linaria vulgaris

Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study

Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: does high nectar production confer tolerance?

The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense

References (44)

The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities

The effects of a bumble bee nectar robber on plant reproductive success and pollinator behavior

Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant

Nectar-robbing bumble bees reduce the fitness of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae)

Nectar Robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: Effects on Pollinator Behavior and Plant Fitness

Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology

Local geographic distributions of bumblebees near Crested Butte, Colorado: competition and community structure

The terminology of floral larceny

Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species

Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences

Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers