Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Threatened Status for the Contiguous U.S. Distinct Population Segment of the Canada Lynx and Related Rule — RMBL Knowledge Commons
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Threatened Status for the Contiguous U.S. Distinct Population Segment of the Canada Lynx and Related Rule
We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), determine threatened status for the contiguous U.S. Distinct Population Segment of the Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis), with a special rule, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. This population segment occurs in forested portions of the States of Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. The contiguous U.S. Distinct Population Segment of the lynx is threatened by the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms. Current U.S. Forest Service Land and Resource Management Plans include programs, practices, and activities within the authority and jurisdiction of Federal land management agencies that may threaten lynx or lynx habitat. The lack of protection for lynx in these Plans render them inadequate to protect the species.
Local Knowledge Graph (Top 61 entities)
Loading graph...
Knowledge graph centered on Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Det with 61 nodes and 60 connections. Top connected: Bureau of Land Management (implied via Federal Register), United States Department of the Interior, USDA Forest Service (Uncompahgre National Forest), Colorado Department of Wildlife (CDOW), U.S. Forest Service (Taylor River District).
Stakeholders (41)
Agencies, organizations, and groups mentioned as actors in this document.
Bureau of Land Management (implied via Federal Register)United States Department of the InteriorUSDA Forest Service (Uncompahgre National Forest)Colorado Department of Wildlife (CDOW)U.S. Forest Service (Taylor River District)United States Department of Agriculture (implied AAA)U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (implied via Ecological Services, Northeast Region)National Park Service (Curecanti National Recreation Area)
Show 33 more
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)Division of Wildlife (CDOW)The Sierra ClubThe Nature Conservancy (TNC)Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC)Federal Register
Crabtree and Sheldon 1999 (1999) — Crabtree and Sheldon
Bailey and Staples 1999 (1999) — Bailey and Staples
Mowat et al. 1999 (1999) — Mowat et al.
Wydeven 1998 (1998) — Wydeven
Parker 1995 (1995) — Parker
Staples 1995 (1995) — Staples
Koehler and Aubry 1994 (1994) — Koehler and Aubry
Brocke et al. 1993 (1993) — Brocke et al.
Jones et al. mammal species classification (1992) — Jones et al.
McKay 1991 (1991) — McKay
Murray and Boutin 1991 (1991) — Murray and Boutin
Koehler and Hornocker bobcat habitat study (1991) — Koehler and Hornocker
Brocke et al. 1991 (1991) — Brocke et al.
Koehler and Brittell 1990 (1990) — Koehler and Brittell
Tumlison lynx taxonomy (1987) — Tumlison
Quinn and Parker lynx morphology study (1987) — Quinn and Parker
Quinn and Parker 1987 (1987) — Quinn and Parker
Todd 1985 (1985) — Todd
Brainerd 1985 (1985) — Brainerd
Smith 1984 (1984) — Smith
Parker et al. 1983 (1983) — Parker et al.
snowshoe hare study (1982) — Buehler and Keith
McCord and Cardoza 1982 (1982) — McCord and Cardoza
McCord and Cardoza lynx range study (1982) — McCord and Cardoza
Brocke 1982 (1982) — Brocke
Parker 1981 (1981) — Parker
snowshoe hare density study (1980) — Wolff
Mech 1980 (1980) — Mech
Nowak 1979 (1979) — Nowak
de Vos and Matel 1952 (1952) — de Vos and Matel
legislation (17)
Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 58 (2000)
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 58 / Friday, March 24, 2000 / Rules and Regulations (2000)
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Threatened Status for the Contiguous U.S. Distinct Population Segment of the Canada Lynx and Related Rule (2000)
Policy on identification of activities that would or would not constitute a violation of section 9 of the Act (1994)
Endangered Species Act amendments of 1982 (1982)
Show 12 more legislation
H.R. Rep. No. 567, Part I, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. (1982)
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (1973)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (1969)
Executive Order 12866
50 CFR Part 17 — Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)
50 CFR part 23 - CITES
50 CFR 17.32 - Permits
50 CFR 17.31 - Prohibitions
Endangered Species Act
National Forest Management Act
Paperwork Reduction Act
report (10)
Summary of Factors (2000)
Record of Compliance for the 4(d) rule (1999)
Forest and BLM administrative units land and resource management plans assessment (1999) — United States Forest Service et al.
Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management nondevelopmental allocations assessment (1999) — United States Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management
Agee 1999 (1999) — Agee
Show 5 more report
Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States (Ruggiero et al.) (1999) — Ruggiero et al.
Draft Biological Assessment of the Effects of National Forest Land and Resource Plans and Bureau of Land Management Land Use Plans on Canada Lynx (1999) — United States Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management
Columbia River Basin assessment (cold forest types and wilderness) (1997) — United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of the Interior
Washington Department of Wildlife 1993 (1993) — Washington Department of Wildlife
Science Report (lynx)
plan (2)
Lynx Conservation Assessment and Strategy (LCAS) (1999) — United States Forest Service et al.
Vertebrate Population Policy
book (1)
Wilson and Reeder mammal species taxonomy (1993) — Wilson and Reeder
other (1)
Notice on Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements under Section 4(a) (1983)