Checking billy barr’s snow log…
Individuals frequently leave home before reaching reproductive age, but the proximate causes of natal dispersal remain relatively unknown. The social cohesion hypothesis predicts that individuals who engage in more (affiliative) interactions are less likely to disperse. Despite the intuitive nature of this hypothesis, support is both limited and equivocal. We used formal social network analyses to quantify precisely both direct and indirect measures of social cohesion in yellow-bellied marmots. Because approximately 50 per cent of female yearlings disperse, we expected that social relationships and network measures of cohesion would predict dispersal. By contrast, because most male yearlings disperse, we expected that social relationships and cohesion would play a less important role. We found that female yearlings that interacted with more individuals, and those that were more socially embedded in their groups, were less likely to disperse. For males, social interactions were relatively unimportant determinants of dispersal. This is the first strong support for the social cohesion hypothesis and suggests that the specific nature of social relationships, not simply the number of affiliative relationships, may influence the propensity to disperse.
Knowledge graph centered on A test of the social cohesion hypothesis: interact with 24 nodes and 126 connections. Top connected: Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a pro, Marmota flaviventris, Daniel T. Blumstein, Survival of dispersing and philopatric yellow-bell, mark-recapture (Sciuridae).
Items connected by shared entities, co-authorship, citations, or semantic similarity.
6 in Knowledge Commons, 32 external